Tailgating and piggybacking are two common security threats that organizations face, particularly in terms of physical security. Tailgating refers to the practice of an unauthorized person following an authorized person into a restricted area, while piggybacking refers to the unauthorized person using an authorized person’s consent to gain access to a restricted area. In both cases, the goal is to gain access to a location or resource that the unauthorized person would not otherwise be able to access. Tailgating often results from a random act of kindness such as holding the door to a stranger. It can be seamless and a lot less suspicious to follow an authorized person rather than breaking into a building. Those with criminal intentions are well aware of this.
The major difference is that “Tailgating” implies no consent (similar to a car tailgating another vehicle on a road), while “piggybacking” usually implies consent of the authorized person.
Tailgating and piggybacking are particularly problematic in environments where physical security is critical, such as data centers, research labs, and financial institutions. These threats are difficult to prevent because they exploit the inherent trust that people have in one another. In most cases, the unauthorized person will pretend to be an authorized person, either by following closely behind them or by using their credentials to gain access to a restricted area.
One of the primary reasons that tailgating and piggybacking are so difficult to prevent is that they rely on social engineering. The unauthorized person is counting on the fact that people are often hesitant to confront others, particularly in situations where they believe that the person they are dealing with is authorized to be there. This makes it difficult for security personnel to identify and prevent these types of attacks. for example: if people see someone having a ID card which looks similar to their organization ID card but carrying lots of food, cake, balloons then most humans inherently wants to be helpful or nice to others for courtesy & open the locked door. similar behaviour is also observed if someone carrying tools which looks like a repairman, cleaning staff then also authorised persons may give the access without knowing that they are under social engineering attack. Another good example is smoking area, where attacker may smoke with targeted people 1-2 days, had some good chat with them and then follow authorized employees to get access in organization premise. Since you already know them due to the interaction in smoking area, you may not doubt on them when they pretend that their access card is not working at access gate. Familiarity works more than authority in social engineering attack. So the options are endless for social engineering attackers.
There are several strategies that organizations can use to prevent tailgating and piggybacking. One of the most effective is to implement a layered security system that includes physical barriers, access control technology, and security personnel. Physical barriers, such as turnstiles and security gates, can be used to limit access to a particular area. Access control technology, such as card readers and biometric scanners, can be used to verify the identity of individuals attempting to gain access. Security personnel can monitor the area and intervene if they observe any suspicious behavior.
Another strategy for preventing tailgating and piggybacking is to educate employees about the risks of these threats and train them to be vigilant. Employees should be instructed to challenge anyone who attempts to follow them into a restricted area, and they should be encouraged to report any suspicious behavior to security personnel.
In addition to these strategies, there are several best practices that organizations can follow to reduce the risk of tailgating and piggybacking. For example, employees should be required to wear identification badges that are clearly visible and should be trained to report lost or stolen badges immediately. Organizations should also enforce a strict “no-tailgating” policy and should implement a system for monitoring and auditing access logs to detect any unauthorized access attempts.
companies and facilities can benefit a thorough security awareness training. They must also have an open dialogue about risks with their employees, and empower everyone to take personal responsibility.
“While random acts of kindness often make someone’s day, but a security breach can ruin many.”
Mantrap:
A mantrap is a physical security mechanism used to control access to a secure area, such as a data center, server room, or other sensitive or high-security area. A mantrap typically consists of an enclosed area with two interlocking doors, one of which must be closed and locked before the other can be opened. This creates a secure holding area where an individual can be screened for authorized access before being allowed into the secure area.
The purpose of a mantrap is to prevent unauthorized access to a secure area by ensuring that only one person at a time can pass through the doors. The interlocking doors prevent anyone from following an authorized person into the secure area or from entering the mantrap with an authorized person. The mantrap also allows security personnel to monitor and control access to the secure area, which can help prevent theft, data breaches, or other security incidents.
In some cases, mantraps may also include additional security measures, such as metal detectors, biometric scanners, or video surveillance cameras. These technologies can be used to further screen individuals for authorized access and to detect any attempts to bring unauthorized items, such as weapons or recording devices, into the secure area. Mantrap with the help of digital practice could become smart enough that it can detect our employees weight and it can verify employee weight with his previous login time weight to ensure that employee does not have any one following him in the man trap chamber. if it finds a major difference in weight then second door will not open without security guard intervention.
Overall, mantraps are an effective physical security mechanism for controlling access to sensitive or high-security areas. They help prevent unauthorized access and can provide an additional layer of protection for valuable assets or sensitive information. However, mantraps should be used in conjunction with other physical security measures, such as access control systems, video surveillance, and security personnel, to ensure a comprehensive security strategy.
Turnstile:
A turnstile is a mechanical gate or barrier that allows only one person at a time to pass through in a specific direction. Turnstiles are commonly used in public areas, such as stadiums, amusement parks, and transportation hubs, to manage crowd control and prevent unauthorized access.
Turnstiles typically consist of a rotating mechanism with arms that are placed perpendicular to the direction of travel. When a person presents a valid ticket or credential, the rotating arms will allow them to pass through in one direction. If someone attempts to pass through in the opposite direction, the arms will prevent them from doing so.
One of the primary benefits of turnstiles is that they can help manage crowds and prevent bottlenecks in high-traffic areas. By allowing only one person to pass through at a time, turnstiles can ensure a smooth and orderly flow of people through a specific area. Turnstiles can also be used to prevent unauthorized access to restricted areas, such as backstage areas in a theater or secure areas in an office building.
In addition to their crowd control and access control benefits, turnstiles can also provide a visual deterrent to potential security threats. The presence of turnstiles can signal to individuals that access to a particular area is restricted and that they will be required to present valid credentials to gain entry.
Overall, turnstiles are a common and effective physical security mechanism that can be used in a variety of settings to manage crowd control, prevent unauthorized access, and provide a visual deterrent to potential security threats. They are relatively easy to install and maintain, and can be used in conjunction with other physical security measures, such as access control systems and video surveillance, to provide a comprehensive security strategy.
Contraband check:
A contraband check is a security procedure used to detect and prevent the introduction of prohibited or illegal items into a specific area, such as a prison, airport, or other high-security facility. The purpose of a contraband check is to ensure that individuals entering the facility are not carrying any items that could pose a threat to the safety and security of the facility or its occupants.
Contraband checks can take a variety of forms, depending on the specific needs and requirements of the facility. They may involve physical searches of individuals, their possessions, or their vehicles using metal detectors, X-ray machines, or other scanning equipment. In some cases, contraband checks may also involve the use of trained dogs to detect the presence of drugs, explosives, or other illegal substances.
Contraband checks are a critical component of physical security, especially in high-security facilities where the introduction of prohibited items could pose a significant threat. They can help prevent incidents such as escape attempts, assaults, or the introduction of drugs or other contraband into the facility.
In addition to physical searches and scanning equipment, contraband checks may also involve background checks and vetting of individuals who are authorized to enter the facility. This can help prevent the introduction of individuals who may pose a security threat, such as convicted felons, known associates of criminal organizations, or individuals with a history of violence.
Overall, contraband checks are an essential security procedure used to detect and prevent the introduction of prohibited or illegal items into a specific area. They are an important component of physical security and can help ensure the safety and security of the facility and its occupants.
Smart cards:
Smart cards are a type of secure electronic device that can be used in physical security systems to authenticate individuals and grant or restrict access to specific areas or resources. There are several types of smart cards used in physical security, including:
Contact Smart Cards:
These smart cards have a small embedded microchip and metal contacts on the card’s surface. The card is inserted into a card reader, which provides power to the chip and allows communication between the card and the reader. Contact smart cards are commonly used for access control, time and attendance, and other physical security applications.
Contactless Smart Cards:
These smart cards use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to communicate wirelessly with card readers. They are held near a card reader to authenticate the user and grant access. Contactless smart cards are popular for physical access control and can be used in applications such as building access, parking garages, and transit systems.
Proximity Cards:
Proximity cards are similar to contactless smart cards, but they use a lower frequency than typical RFID technology, making them ideal for short-range applications such as access control. They are often used for building access and other physical security applications.
Magnetic Stripe Cards:
These cards have a stripe on the back that contains magnetic information. When swiped through a reader, the information is transmitted to the access control system to grant or restrict access. Magnetic stripe cards are often used for time and attendance tracking, building access, and other physical security applications.
Dual-Interface Cards:
These cards combine the functionality of contact and contactless smart cards. They have a microchip and metal contacts for use with card readers that require a physical connection, as well as an antenna for use with contactless readers.
Smart cards are a popular choice for physical security systems because they provide an additional layer of security and can help prevent unauthorized access to sensitive areas or resources. They can also be used to store additional information such as biometric data, making them a versatile and flexible solution for physical security applications.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, tailgating and piggybacking are serious security threats that can compromise the physical security of organizations. These threats are difficult to prevent because they rely on social engineering and the trust that people have in one another. However, by implementing a layered security system, educating employees, and following best practices, organizations can reduce the risk of these threats and maintain the integrity of their physical security.
The safety of people should always take priority over material possessions. As a result, it is recommended that mantraps and turnstiles should have a fail-open mechanism to allow people to exit in case of an emergency, even if they do not have their ID cards or are unable to prove their identity. Failing to implement fail-open mechanisms could result in serious consequences for executive management, including potential legal repercussions and even imprisonment in cases where human life is lost during an emergency.
A2Talks advises that it is important to value the safety of employees and visitors over the protection of servers and other material assets. In emergency situations, it is critical that staff members are able to exit the building safely and quickly, without hindrance or delay. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that fail-open mechanisms be put in place for mantraps and turnstiles, and that emergency evacuation plans be established and regularly rehearsed to ensure the safety of all individuals in the event of an emergency.
***End***